martes, 24 de abril de 2018
The propaganda sorcerers are back in the era of cyber-narcissism
The scandal surrounding the improper use of data by Cambridge Analytica and Facebook in the 2016 U.S. election is reminiscent of the old debates about propaganda and its ability to “violate the minds of the masses,” according to Sergei Tchakhotin, an expert in the study of Nazi propaganda.
Continue reading here.
lunes, 23 de abril de 2018
El retorno de los brujos: propaganda, algoritmos afectivos y narcisismo cibernético
El escándalo alrededor del uso indebido de datos por parte de Cambridge Analytica y de Facebook en las elecciones de Estados Unidos recuerda los viejos debates sobre la propaganda y su capacidad de “violar las mentes de las masas” (le viole des foules), según la conocida expresión del estudioso del nazismo Sergei Tchakhotin. Decía Tchakhotin que las masas fueron objeto de una sofisticada maquinaria de manipulación que pudo, por medio del uso estratégico de la radio y del cine (los medios de masa del momento) y de grandes puestas en escena (los impresionantes desfiles y mítines del nazismo), tocar las fibras emocionales de los alemanes, sus "pulsiones básicas", en palabras del sociólogo ruso.
Leer más aquí.
Etiquetas:
Algoritmos,
Antonio Damasio,
Cambridge Anlytica,
Comunicación,
Emociones,
Facebook,
Goebbels,
Narcisismo,
Nazism,
Política,
Propaganda,
Redes Sociales,
Yuval Noah Harari
domingo, 15 de abril de 2018
Venezuela destruida
Esta es mi respuesta a María Páez Víctor, quien escribió en el Correo Canadiense de Toronto una apología de la dictadura de Nicolás Maduro. La pueden leer haciendo click aquí.
Etiquetas:
Canadá,
Chavismo,
Chavistas,
Correo Canadiense,
Crisis Económica,
Hugo Chávez,
María Páez Víctor,
Nicolás Maduro,
Propaganda,
Toronto,
Venezuela
lunes, 2 de abril de 2018
Continuidad del horror: del esqueleto de Bolívar a los cuerpos carbonizados de Policarabobo
Hay continuidad visual entre la imagen del esqueleto de Simón Bolívar difundida por televisión el 15 de julio de 2010 y las terribles fotos de los cadáveres de las personas que murieron en la sede de la policía del Estado Carabobo. En el primer caso, Hugo Chávez quiso mostrar urbi et orbi la apertura del sarcófago que contenía los restos del Libertador, con la excusa de investigar las “verdaderas” causas de la muerte de Bolívar. En el caso más reciente, las imágenes documentan el horror de lo que se califica como la peor masacre carcelaria ocurrida en Venezuela. Aunque los dos eventos sean distintos en su génesis y motivaciones, ambos representan la degradación del estado de derecho, de las instituciones y de la sociedad. Y dicha degradación queda capturada en las grotescas imágenes de un esqueleto inerme y de unos cuerpos carbonizados, como si se tratara de un gran cuadro panorámico que resume el daño que el chavismo le ha hecho a la psiquis del venezolano.
Leer más aquí.
Etiquetas:
Chavismo,
Esperpéntico,
Esperpento,
Grotesco,
Hugo Chávez,
masacre,
Nicolás Maduro,
Policarabobo,
Propaganda,
Simón Bolívar,
Venezolanos,
Venezuela
miércoles, 21 de marzo de 2018
Why Linda McQuaig is so wrong about Venezuela?
The article of Linda McQuaig about Venezuela is so wrong in so many ways. First, she distorts the facts to portray the Venezuelan tragedy as "a bitter class war, with millions of poor people committed to defending a revolution carried out in their name." Second, she took sides to defend a corrupt and criminal regime, repeating the hollow rhetoric of Nicolás Maduro and his cronies about the "economic war against a nation" that does not exist. Actually, the only war is the one that the regime of Nicolas Maduro is waging against his own people.
But Linda McQuaig suffers from ideological blindness. She cannot see what is happening in Venezuela because she bought the arguments of Maduro to justify his wrongdoings. She forgot to mention that the policies of the Maduro regime - following the same populist prescriptions instituted by Hugo Chávez - have caused the free fall of the economy: deep recession in the last four years (minus 10 GDP this year), hyperinflation rising to three digits (expected to rise to 14,000 percent this year), maxi devaluation of the currency, and the destruction of the national oil company PDVSA.
She cannot see either that Venezuelans are living a truly humanitarian crisis. Hunger is a real problem. Malnutrition among the poor, particularly children, has been widely documented. Venezuelans are also dying or suffering because they don't have access to medication and basic medical services.
Linda McQuaig is blind to the reality that Venezuelans live under a violent and cruel regime. During four months of protests the Maduro regime murdered more than 100 people. Or that there are still almost 300 political prisoners, many of them civilians submitted, illegally, to trials in military courts. She did not say that the political police of the government, Sebin, does not comply with judges ordering the release of prisoners and extorts them and their families, asking for large sums of money in US dollars to "buy" their freedom. Or that the poor are enslaved through the CLAP system, a perverse program of social control through the distribution of food bags. She forgot to say that crime is out of control. More than 20 thousand people are murdered each year. Prisons have become the paradise of criminals, under the control of gang leaders, thanks to the complicity of government officials.
Linda McQuaig is so wrong about Venezuela that she does not know the history of the country. Chávez did not nationalize the oil industry, as she wrongfully wrote. The oil industry was nationalized in 1976 during the first government of Carlos Andrés Pérez. Nevertheless, this should be a "minor" detail for someone who dares to defend a regime that is the source of suffering and horror for millions of Venezuelans.
Etiquetas:
Canada,
Canadá,
Chavismo,
Hugo Chávez,
Isaac Nahón Serfaty,
Left,
Linda McQuaig,
MetroNews Canada,
NDP,
Nicolás Maduro,
Propaganda,
The Toronto Star,
Venezuela
domingo, 18 de marzo de 2018
Being a Sephardi Moroccan Venezuelan Canadian Jew: A case of multiple identities
Everybody is obsessed with identity these days. People look
deeper to find their roots. They have their DNAs checked by ancestry.com or
geni.com to find out their genetics mix (because we are all the result of a mix
–there is no “racial” purity fortunately – but we – the humanity - seem to come
from the same parents, as shown by a recent study published in Science
journal). There is identity politics and its subdivisions: gender,
religious, language politics. Certainly we, Jews, have been obsessed with our
identity, either from within but mainly from outside, particularly when those
who wanted to destroy us had a supposedly “clear” answer to the question “Who
is a Jew?” I won’t try to answer this question – I prefer to leave it as an
open question -. Instead I propose to explore the multiples dimensions of
identity, and I will try to do so with the case I think I know the better, my
own case as a Sephardi Moroccan Venezuelan Canadian Jew.
The Argentine writer Jorge Luis Borges said in a lecture
about James Joyce and the Irish culture – he was quoting the Norwegian-American
sociologist Thorstein Veblen – that the intellectual pre-eminence of Jews in
modern Europe was mainly due to the fact that the Jews in the Western world
were dealing with a culture that was not theirs, a culture to which they did
not profess any “loyalty” (here I am quoting Borges), a culture that they could
approach without superstitions, and in many occasions, with a revolutionary
aim. Without pretending to answer the
question Who is a Jew, I can say - based on Borges and Veblen’s points of view
– that we are is this double and even ambiguous position in society that allows
us to have a look at the same from inside and from outside, with a certain
detachment, but also with a certain nostalgia or saudade (as the Portuguese say).
I will explore today two dimensions of this multiple Sephardic
Moroccan Venezuelan Canadian Jewish being: the language (or the languages I
should say), and what I call the “painful identity”.
The languages
It always seemed to me that the title of the first volume of
the memoirs of the Literature Nobel Laureate Elias Canetti, The Tongue Set Free (that could be
translated alternately in French as La
langue sauvée), referred to the German, the language in which this
Sephardic Jew born in Bulgaria wrote his books. Canetti himself explains the
title in the first chapter of his memoirs, based on a childhood memory in which
a man, the lover of his nanny, threatened to cut off his tongue. The absolved
tongue (langue in French or lengua in Spanish) represents the
physical organ that the writer "saved" from that man's razor that,
with that intimidating gesture, ensured the child's silence (Tomás Eloy
Martínez preferred to call this book La
lengua salvada or The Saved Tongue/Language). But in the field of
interpretations, we could say that Canetti "saved" and
"acquitted" the German, the language of the Nazi executioners, as a
gesture of reaffirmation and victory. One of his other languages was Ladino
(he also spoke French and English), which he called the "language of the
kitchen" (la lengua de la cocina),
a language that he learned as a child from his mother, a proud Sephardic Jew
who thought that her Spanish origins gave them a certain aristocratic character.
I was born in Tangier, Morocco. My parents were born in
Tetouan, a small city near Tangier. They are the daughter and son of tetaunis, Jews descendants of those
expelled from Spain in 1492. It is probably that my ancestors (Nahon, Serfaty,
Laredo, Israel, Abudarham) came to Tetouan from the town of Naon in Oviedo, and
Granada, and it is also very probably that they arrived in Morocco at the same
time that the moors expelled from Andalusia.
There was an important cultural difference between these two
groups of expelled people, or “megorashim”
as we say in Hebrew. The moors kept
their language (the Arab) and continued to develop a culture and institutions
in their language. But we, the Sephardic
Jews had a particular link with Spain, the Spanish language. Isolated from the
rest of the world, those Jews kept this language as a treasure with a mix of
nostalgia and pride. The romances, a form of poetry born in Spain that we
assimilated and kept in the form of folk songs, express very well this feeling
of nostalgia, of homesick, of the cities, the landscapes, the flavours, the
music of this country that did not like us, a country that meant also
suffering, death and destruction for the Jewish people. This is a strange love
affair, a love affair that has the language as its most precious object. That’s
why my grandmother sung and even today we sing romances like this one: “En la ciudad de Toledo, en la ciudad de
Granada, vivía un mancebo que Diego León se llama …” (in the city of
Toledo, in the city of Granada, used to live a young man called Diego
León).
The Spanish was also a mean to express our religious life.
There is something in the judeo-español,
our particular form of ancient Spanish called Haketía mixed with Hebrew and Arab, that communicates an extra
dimension to the prayers and texts of our tradition. A good example of this is
the Pesach Hagadah. For me is very important that after saying in Aramaic “Ha lahma hanya di ahalu abahatana dearha
demisrayim…”, to recite the judeo-español translation, that is more than a
translation, a text that captures the very essence of Pesach as Zeman Herutenu, the Time of our Liberation.
And I read as my grandfather and my father did every Seder: “Este es el pan de la aflicción que comieron
nuestros padres en tierra de Egipto. Todo el que tenga hambre que venga y
coma…”.
We moved to Venezuela when I was six years old, in 1968. The
Spanish language, the language we cherished, this treasure we carry everywhere
we go, helped us to make the connection with this wonderful and now troubled
country where the Spanish is spoken with the flavour (el sabor) of the people from the Caribbean. In some way, we never
felt like strangers in this new land. As my mother said when she saw for the
first time the Venezuelans in the La Guaira Port: “It seems that we never left
Tangier”. The Mediterranean, the Caribbean, the Moroccans, the Venezuelans,
these mestizos peoples, and the
experience, so common to us in our history of wandering people, of hybrid
cultures, of being a people among the peoples.
But there is a Jewish language that transcends the Ashkenazi
/ Sephardic division, and that communicates something that is uniquely Jewish
beyond the language through which is conveyed, either Hebrew, Yiddish, Ladino,
French or English. There is a scene from Seinfeld that summarizes for me what
could be the "Jewish language" par excellence. Jerry's father, who is
spending a few days in New York, calls a friend in South Florida (where the old
American and Canadian Jews go to retire), who reacts to the unexpected call by
asking with a very Jewish cry: " Who died?". The call was not to
announce the death of anyone, but to ask a favor. But in the Jewish code
"Who died?" says a lot about that way we Jews talk, no matter our
origins and languages.
The Seinfeld scene, which reflects the interaction between
two typically American Jews, and probably Ashkenazi New Yorkers, could have
been perfectly played by two Moroccan or Turkish Jews. The Jewish code, fed by
a series of common imaginaries that make up the Jewish thinking and feeling,
has a certain universality that even overcomes the barriers of time. In some passages
of the Bible and the Talmud, to mention two canonical texts of Judaism, we
already find some passages that could have been written by Woody Allen, the
Marx brothers or Larry David. For example, in an exchange between the sages
around the story of the Tower of Babel collected in the Midrash (legends or
stories that complement the biblical narrative) is told, describing the fact
that God "came down" to see the construction of the tower, the
following: "Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai says: this represents one of the ten
descents mentioned by the Torah (made by the Holy One, Blessed be He, to the Earth).
'That the sons of man had built'. Oh well, and what they would have said, Rabbi
Berechia exclaimed, that they were the children of a donkey or a camel!"
Going back to Borges and Velben, we can say that the Jewish
language, embedded in the languages of our many diasporas, has this duality of
memory and irony, and if you want cynicism, that connects us with the past and also
provides us with the necessary critical look about the world and the human
beings.
Painful identity
Another universal Jewish experience is what I call the
“painful identity.” Identity is not purely positive affirmation, it is also
conflict or “déchirement” as we say
in French. The expression “painful identity” came to my mind when Daniel Shoer
Roth, now a journalist in Miami's The New Herald, told me a very revealing
anecdote of the twists and turns of Jewishness. A few years ago, Daniel wrote a
book about five great Jewish-Venezuelan journalists: Gustavo Arnstein, Alicia
Freilich, Paulina Gamus, Carlos Guerón and Sofía Imber. One day a renowned
Venezuelan editor and columnist, whose name I won’t disclose, complained to
Daniel because he had not included him in the book. Daniel answered with surprise:
"I never thought you would consider yourself as a Jew." But identity
is a changing and deeply emotional thing. Who knows if this editor and
columnist, who at another time in his life chose to avoid identification with
the Jews, over the years felt a need to express his Jewishness.
As you know, Spain passed a law two years ago to give the
Spanish citizenship to the descendants of the Jews expelled in 1492. I don’t know
how many Sephardic Jews have applied for the citizenship, but I do know that many
Venezuelans who were barely aware of their Jewish origins have applied to
become Spaniards. Individuals bearing the names Maduro (yes, Maduro as the
current Venezuelan president), Capriles (as the leader of Venezuelan democratic
opposition), De Sola, Ricardo, Mendoza, Benatuil, Curiel, Nunes, from families
that long time ago assimilated and became Catholics, remembered suddenly that
their ancestors came to Venezuela via Curaçao, from where they arrived as
Spanish-Portuguese Dutch Jews, the same families that in the XVII Century
arrived to New Amsterdam (today New York) and founded the Congregation Shearith
Israel, the Spanish-Portuguese synagogue, in 1654. And these Venezuelans found suddenly
their Sephardic connection to obtain the Spanish citizenship to flee the hell
that is Venezuela today, the country with the highest inflation rate in the
world (14,000 per cent projected for this year, according to the FMI), crime
out of control, and scarcity of medications and food.
Another case of “painful identity” that I documented in an
article I co-wrote with my friend Néstor Garrido, is the one of Venezuelans
who converted to Judaism and decided to move to Israel amidst this horrible
crisis. As in many other countries in Latin America (Peru, Colombia, Bolivia),
former Evangelical Venezuelans converted to Judaism and decided to make aliah, but they have faced many hurdles,
some internal (there is no Israeli consulate in Venezuela because president
Hugo Chávez broke diplomatic relations with Israel) and some external (they
also faced some problems associated with the politics of conversion in Israel).
The Jewish community in Venezuela is facing something that we
have seen in other once prosperous and vibrant communities in Morocco, Egypt,
Lebanon, Poland or Germany. They are in the process of decline in the middle of
a terrible crisis that is affecting all Venezuelans without distinction of
religion or origin. I won’t say that the community is facing antisemitism, but
the anti-Israeli politics of the current regime has certainly introduced the
“Jewish question” into the public sphere, in a country that welcome the Jews
after the war and where Jewish institutions (schools, synagogues, social and
sport centers, museums) flourished. I would like to mention specially the
important role that the Centro de
Estudios Sefardíes de Caracas (the Center of Sephardic Studies in Caracas)
has played in the diffusion of our Sephardic heritage through conferences,
concerts, recordings, books and the journal Maguén-Escudo.
But I don’t want to finish this presentation on a negative
note. I want to highlight many of the positive things of the Venezuelan Jewish
community, its contributions to science and arts, and its achievements in
promoting and enriching our Sephardic legacy. For example, the only Venezuelan
Nobel Prize of Medicine is the Sephardi Baruch Benacerraf, whose family
migrated to Venezuela from Tetouan, Morocco. Or the case of the filmmaker
Margot Benacerraf who won the Critics Prize at the Festival of Cannes for her
movie Araya. Or the wonderful novel
by Isaac Chocrón, Rómpase en caso de
incendio (Break in case of fire), where a Venezuelan Jew returns to Morocco
looking for his multiple identities; the recordings of Esther Rofé where she
sings the wonderful Spanish romances that we cherished so much; the liturgical
recordings of Moisés Serfaty; the translation into modern Spanish of the
Haftaroth by Rafael Encaoua and David Suisa; the Letter (La carta) that Lucy Garzón wrote in Haketía, a wonderful piece of Jewish humor; the Sephardic Week
Festival organized by Moisés Garzón, Jacob Carciente, Amram Cohén, Abraham
Botbol, Abraham Levy, Isaac Benarroch, Aquiba Benarroch Lasry, Miriam Harrar,
Priscilla Abecasis, Alberto Moryusef, among many others. I can go on and on
mentioning many other accomplishments. I just want to thank Limmud Ottawa for
giving the opportunity to talk about this community that is facing today many
challenges, but is always fighting to keep alive nuestro corazón judío,
our Jewish heart. Gracias.
*Talk presented at Limmud Ottawa on March 18, 2018.
sábado, 18 de noviembre de 2017
Correcting Professor Lisa North: Chavismo has destroyed Venezuela
![]() |
| Venezuelans looking for food in trash bags: the legacy of chavismo (Photo: AFP) |
Here is my letter to the Editor:
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Chavismo has destroyed Venezuela
PUBLISHED :Wednesday, Nov. 15, 2017 12:00 AM
Re: “Roots of Venezuela’s crisis run deeper than Chávez, Maduro” (The Hill Times, Nov. 8, p. 18). An op-ed about Venezuela by Liisa North, professor emeritus of political science at York University, repeated some of the half-truths and lies that President Nicolás Maduro’s regime reiterates ad nauseam. Her argument is that the 40 years of democracy that preceded the election of Hugo Chávez as president were not that different from the current nightmare that afflicts Venezuelans.
A majority of Venezuelans elected Mr. Chávez in 1998, rejecting the two-party system that prevailed in the country since the previous dictatorship was toppled in 1958. But the 40 years of the civilian republic were not the dark times depicted by Prof. North.
Corruption was certainly present, but it never had the same scope as the current corruption. It’s also true that towards of the end of the ‘70s, the Venezuelan economy started to show some signs of decline, but the mismanagement never grew to the current catastrophic levels.
The policies of the Maduro regime, following the same populist prescriptions instituted by Mr. Chávez, have caused the free fall of the economy: deep recession in the last four years, hyperinflation rising to three digits, maxi-devaluation of the currency, and the destruction of the national oil company PDVSA.
But the main problem with Prof. North’s text is that she forgot to mention the current tragedy that Venezuelans are facing. They are living a humanitarian crisis. Hunger is a real problem. Malnutrition among the poor, particularly children, has been widely documented. Venezuelans are also dying or suffering because they don’t have access to medication and basic medical services.
She forgot to say that in four months of protests against the Maduro regime, more than 100 people have been killed; or that there are almost 500 political prisoners, many of them civilians submitted, illegally, to trials in military courts. She did not say that the political police of the government, Sebin, does not comply with judges ordering the release of prisoners, and extorts them and their families, asking for large sums of money in United States dollars to “buy” their freedom. She also didn’t say that the poor are enslaved through the CLAP system, a perverse program of social control through the distribution of food bags. She forgot to say that crime is out of control. More than 20,000 people are murdered each year. Prisons have become the paradise of criminals, under the control of gang leaders, thanks to the complicity of government officials.
The main political challenge of the democratic opposition is to rebuild its leadership and propose a consensual vision that will appeal to Venezuelans.
In the meantime, the international community and Canada should maintain the pressure on the Maduro regime to restore democracy, the respect of the constitution, and human rights.
Isaac Nahón-Serfaty
Venezuelan journalist and associate professor
University of Ottawa
Ottawa, Ont.
Etiquetas:
Canada,
Chávez,
Chavismo,
Isaac Nahón Serfaty,
Lisa North,
Nicolás Maduro,
Ottawa,
The Hill Times,
Venezuela,
York University
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)






